John Sayers' Design Forum

John Sayers' Recording Studio Design Forum

A World of Experience
Click Here for Information on John's Services
It is currently Sun May 26, 2013 6:53 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 56 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 11:38 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 6:37 pm
Posts: 882
Location: Regional Victoria, Aus
Hi Mr Cut,

From my experience, I "floated" the Control room walls on 50mm Expansion Joint Foam and didn't "float" the drum room.
The difference is very noticable. The control room is much quieter.
Oh if I could travel back in time......

_________________
inkspotproductions
www.bantamstudio.info


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 12:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2006 11:02 am
Posts: 107
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
That's interesting Lilith, did you still use dynabolts or some kind of mechanical tie-downs on the sole plates?

_________________
Adam
Clarence Drive Film & Sound Studio


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 7:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:41 am
Posts: 24
Location: London
xSpace wrote:
What >could< be done is to have a truss built that incorporates this 45 degree angle into the design so as to help distribute the load


Thanks Brien. I think once again my diagram was letting my down. The previous diagram was a cross-section through the middle of the wall. I intend to use a truss, as roughly sketched below, to support this structure.

Attachment:
truss.PNG
truss.PNG [ 10.14 KiB | Viewed 240 times ]


Was this the sort of thing you mean?

lilith_envy wrote:
From my experience, I "floated" the Control room walls on 50mm Expansion Joint Foam and didn't "float" the drum room.
The difference is very noticable. The control room is much quieter.
Oh if I could travel back in time......


That certainly is very interesting! Can I ask three questions - what surface were your walls "floated" above, what company manufactured the foam you used, and did the foam cover you entire bottom of the wall or was it just in sections or strips?

Thanks so much for all your contributions, everybody.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 11:42 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 10:54 am
Posts: 3720
Location: Exit 4, Alabama
floated anything requires a fully decoupled connection, walls included.

_________________
Brien Holcombe
_____________________________________________
Sound: You can't stop it, you can only try to contain it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 3:09 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 6:37 pm
Posts: 882
Location: Regional Victoria, Aus
Hi,

Yes each wall section had 2 x dyna bolts.
You can use rubber gym mats, I just used expansion joint foam. Off the shelf...not sure of the brand.

If this makes no sense, it could be down to the two different brands of wool?
But the difference is quite significant.

The foam can also help with levelling little differences in cement level.

Oh and yes I built on a slab.

lil

_________________
inkspotproductions
www.bantamstudio.info


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2011 8:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2006 11:02 am
Posts: 107
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
I think the gym matt mystery deserves it's own thread here.

_________________
Adam
Clarence Drive Film & Sound Studio


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2011 11:27 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 10:54 am
Posts: 3720
Location: Exit 4, Alabama
I think there certainly must be a slight mitigation, dry friction, in the use of anything on the bottom of a wall assembly.

My thinking is more that the air leaks are sealed, rather than there is some dramatic acoustical change by the simple inclusion of a rubber mat or some sort of device in hope of decoupling a wall from a floor.

_________________
Brien Holcombe
_____________________________________________
Sound: You can't stop it, you can only try to contain it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 8:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:41 am
Posts: 24
Location: London
Thanks guys, that certainly sounds like an interesting recommendation, given the advantage of smoothing out any uneven surfaces in the concrete slab and preventing air gaps. I take it it's not cheaper than simply using acoustic caulk?

On a different point - with studs 3.13m high, how many horizontal bracings (or noggings as they are known in the UK) would you recommend using?

Thanks a lot!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 11:00 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 10:54 am
Posts: 3720
Location: Exit 4, Alabama
That usually comes in the form of a code consideration. As it stands, the blocking is placed at 4 foot intervals, or the Metric equivalent.

As it applies to an interior framed assembly, it is, all seismic considerations included, not something I have to worry about in the US, and I reside in hurricane alley. The exterior of the structure has to be taken care of first, the decoupled interior is different...but all countries and some states/counties here, have different considerations depending on this activity.

Chile wants all interior wall plates bolted to the slab...not so in Mobile, Alabama but California and Memphis, TN may have different considerations.

Dade County (Miami, Florida) are building with concrete these days, much like Chile, but for different reasons.

OSB plywood is the best shear sheathing you can apply, replaces go-bolts and reduces the blocking, noggins as you guys refer to them as, to the height of the shearing sheathing, typically 8 feet but can be purchased in nine foot long panels to allow for covering the 8 foot wall assembly and lapping the upper level floor band...essentially tying the entire lower floor level to the upper and providing a blocked break for the tie in.

_________________
Brien Holcombe
_____________________________________________
Sound: You can't stop it, you can only try to contain it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 9:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:41 am
Posts: 24
Location: London
Thanks guys, that's really handy. Think I might get in on Monday, very exciting. If anyone who has kindly written on here is interested in viewing my sketchup model, I have uploaded it here:

http://soupstudio.co.uk/plan.skp

Plan shows the existing wall and the studwall that I have designed. With all of your help.

Cheers!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 10:26 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 10:17 am
Posts: 6100
Location: Santiago, Chile
Quote:
If anyone who has kindly written on here is interested in viewing my sketchup model, I have uploaded it here:
The basic looks good, and the live room seems to be properly decoupled (although you could probably save on wood by straightening and/or angling some of those walls a bit), but the control room is not decoupled, and there are several flanking paths directly from the CR inner leaf to the rest of the building. You might want to fix those.

- Stuart -

_________________
I want this studio to amaze people. "That'll do" doesn't amaze people.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 56 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group