John Sayers' Design Forum

John Sayers' Recording Studio Design Forum

A World of Experience
Click Here for Information on John's Services
It is currently Sun Dec 08, 2019 6:07 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Oct 19, 2019 2:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:50 pm
Posts: 1
Location: Doonan, Queensland, Australia
Hi All,

I’ve been asked to measure a friends shipping container recording studio for frequency response and isolation. I was wondering if anyone would like to weigh in with advice on the method I’m planning to use?

The equipment that I have is an Earthworks M30 microphone and an audio interface and the speakers which are in the studio which are Event Opal’s. I’m using Fuzz Measure software on a MacBook Pro.

The studio is built with soffit mounted positions for the speakers. The position for the mixing console/control surface is also fixed so the mix position is defined.

I plan to set up the microphone at mix position and run sweeps over 10 seconds from the single speaker left, single speaker right, then left and right combined. There is also a listening position for guests at the rear of the room. I’ll take further measurements at this position using the same L, R, L&R combo. Does this sound sufficient & workable? Will this provide usable results. Would I need to take a speaker out and put it on a stand & try reversing everything to get more complete results or would the single end method be sufficient?

For the isolation measurements I was planning on moving the speaker onto a stand inside the space and placing it 1m from the boundary facing the boundary. ie the wall.
Then placing the mic outside 1m from the boundary and measuring with sweeps and pink noise. Do this for all boundaries & averaging the results. To seal the studio i will need to have a separate device to generate sweeps & pink noise in the room, i will use another laptop to do this. Does this sound like it will give usable results? Should i reverse this process & generate outside & measure inside or would the same results occur? (Obviously there would be less ambient sound to effect results)

Would anyone like to offer a better solution with the equipment I have? Or any general advice?

Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks in advance.


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2019 8:07 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2017 6:03 pm
Posts: 1061
Location: St. Albert, Alberta, Canada
Sorry for the late reply, but here is everything you need to know:

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=21122

Also, REW's manual covers most of the topics in terms of understanding the measurement results.

Greg

_________________
It appears that you've made the mistake most people do. You started building without consulting this forum.


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 26, 2019 1:54 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 3:31 am
Posts: 172
Location: Cork Ireland
For Isolation and Modal investigation you can use a powerful mobile speaker. Quality is important within reason. A small modern bin and top PA, Mono, be fine.
To see all the modes well, place the speaker in a tri corner, i.e. floor corner. If you have two subs, two opposing corners.
Place the mic in the opposite tricorner. Ceiling corner, close to the surface, PZM style. If you have time and energy do the other corners also. This will light up all the modes strongly. For listening accuracy and possible Target Curve generation, you seem to have all that in order. One point, I would test a listening zone. Albeit quite small, say 1.5M x 1M. We do move about, but even at a fixed optimum spot neither of the two ears is at your nose! If you stand sometimes, measure that too.

Isolation..... there are well defined, to a legal level, standards. Is that your purpose? i.e. Legally defined for planning/neighbour reasons? Or do you just want to assess in terms that a regular audio engineer will understand? In either case best to have an Integrating SPL Meter. For assessment there are iPhone Meters. Here's a fine free one. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/noise/app.html Calibration and such is not important as you are measuring differences not absolutes. Integrating Meters measure a 'dose' over say 3 Minutes. Sorta like the LUFS we are now adopting in Mastering. https://www.bksv.com/media/doc/br0047.pdf
For legal purposes the instruments are megabuck and certified, and have to be operated by a qualified operator.
You have obviously read some of the methodology, but don't forget to try different locations quickly. Move abut, listen. Look for trouble, traffic, trains, planes. Windows and doors, ventilation.... Leaks.
In and out is totally symmetrical but there will probably be a higher background level outside. This can determine if leakage is a problem or not.

_________________
DD
www.irishacoustics.com
www.soundsound.ie


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group