John Sayers' Design Forum

John Sayers' Recording Studio Design Forum

A World of Experience
Click Here for Information on John's Services
It is currently Wed Jun 19, 2013 9:31 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 16, 2004 11:51 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 3:50 am
Posts: 1058
Location: New Milford, CT, USA
Andre,

> To paraphrase then "By the time you move up to 4th and 5th harmonics, of the axial modes, the non-axial modes and SBIR have a much more significant effect than the room modes." Is that close? <

It seems to me that non-axial modes would diminish in significance just as quickly. But I admit I've never measured that specifically. I'm not convinced non-axial modes really account for much anyway, outside of a theoretical completely empty room having very rigid boundaries. Clearly, boundary interference is at least as important as anything else, whether you consider the distance between the speaker and the boundary or the listener and the boundary. In fact, I've argued that boundary interference is the fundamental cause of peaks and nulls in small rooms, and modes are just a subset. The following is from the Room Modes article on my company's web site:

Quote:
Acoustic interference occurs outdoors against a single boundary, and so doesn't even require a room. As you close off one wall, then two, and so forth until the room is completely enclosed, the interference patterns simply become stronger and more complex due to interaction, reinforcement, and resonance within the enclosed space. But simple boundary interference is the basis - the parent property, if you will - and the additional subset properties of room modes develop when the space becomes enclosed.


> Is this a simplification of concepts like the Schroeder frequency? <

I don't know what Shroeder's frequency is so I can't comment on that.

--Ethan

_________________
The acoustic treatment experts
Buy my DVD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 17, 2004 12:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 8:32 am
Posts: 250
Location: Kansas, USA
Andre,
AVare wrote:
To paraphrase then "By the time you move up to 4th and 5th harmonics, of the axial modes, the non-axial modes and SBIR have a much more significant effect than the room modes." Is that close?

Is this a simplification of concepts like the Schroeder frequency?

I hope you don't mind my jumping in here. :)

By time you move up to the 4th and 5th order modes in a room, the modal density will have increased considerably. Likewise, the average modal spacing will have decreased significantly. This usually leads to an audible "evenness" in an untreated space. As the modes are damped by treatments in the room, some persnickety frequencies (often axials, sometimes tangentials, rarely obliques) could cause problems. It simply depends on what frequency range is being considered versus what frequency range is being damped and where in the room the damping is placed.

E.g., if you have treatments that damp the modes in a room down to 150 Hz, but there's a 4th order axial at 100 Hz, then it might be a much more noticeable problem after treatments.

SBIR is fully explained in myriad references. Suffice to say, at any given listening position in an otherwise empty room, you will have 6 "first order" SBIR frequencies, 6² "second" order, and so forth. The first order frequencies are usually the most troublesome. In fact, it is often only the bounces from the front and back wall that are even noticeable. And their effect in a typical listening room can usually be sufficiently damped with good broadband treatments on the front and back walls.

Finally, I am not particularly fond of the Schroeder frequency for small rooms, since Schroeder developed the formula for this frequency with large rooms in mind. A better frequency to use, IMO, is the "Davis" frequency (from Sound System Engineering, by Davis & Davis):

3*c/Lmin

where c = speed of sound in air and
Lmin = smallest room dimension.

It is worth noting that:
1. This is equivalent to the highest 6th order axial mode.
2. A comment that accompanies this frequency in the Davis text is "Do not view it as a rigid fixed frequency."

Best regards,

Jeff D. Szymanski
Chief Acoustical Engineer
Auralex Acoustics, Inc.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 17, 2004 2:08 am 
Offline
Confused, but not senile yet
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 1:56 pm
Posts: 2300
Location: Hanilton, Ontario, Canada
Quote:
Finally, I am not particularly fond of the Schroeder frequency for small rooms, since Schroeder developed the formula for this frequency with large rooms in mind. A better frequency to use, IMO, is the "Davis" frequency (from Sound System Engineering, by Davis & Davis):

3*c/Lmin


It is interesting to note how certain practices become formalized over time. In Acoustics and Noise Control , Rettinger calculates modes up to the fifth harmonic.

Just a quick in case takes that the wrong way. Davis and Davis helped lead the world of electronics and acoustics from one one plateau to the next one up in changing it from an art to a science.

Andre[/i]


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 17, 2004 2:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 8:32 am
Posts: 250
Location: Kansas, USA
Andre,
AVare wrote:
Davis and Davis helped lead the world of electronics and acoustics...

One of my favorite quotes:
Don Davis wrote:
In audio and acoustics the fundamentals are not difficult; the physics are.

Best regards,

Jeff D. Szymanski
Chief Acoustical Engineer
Auralex Acoustics, Inc.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Room dimensions
PostPosted: Tue Mar 16, 2010 9:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 9:22 am
Posts: 66
Location: Paris, France
lovecow wrote:
A better frequency to use, IMO, is the "Davis" frequency (from Sound System Engineering, by Davis & Davis):

3*c/Lmin

where c = speed of sound in air and
Lmin = smallest room dimension.


Digging up...

Is this metric or imperial ?

Thanks !

_________________
Some people call me an expert... don't believe that ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Room dimensions
PostPosted: Tue Mar 16, 2010 11:46 pm 
Offline
Confused, but not senile yet
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 1:56 pm
Posts: 2300
Location: Hanilton, Ontario, Canada
msikio wrote:
lovecow wrote:
A better frequency to use, IMO, is the "Davis" frequency (from Sound System Engineering, by Davis & Davis):

3*c/Lmin

where c = speed of sound in air and
Lmin = smallest room dimension.


Digging up...

Is this metric or imperial ?

Yes. Use either consistently.

Speed of sound in m/s and Lmin in meters: or,
Speed of sound in ft/s and Lmin in feet.

Andre

_________________
Good studio building is 90% design and 10% construction


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 12:44 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 10:54 am
Posts: 3721
Location: Exit 4, Alabama
lovecow wrote:
And Louden, in turn, was based on Bolt (ca. 1938). What is often omitted in the presentation of Bolt's famous ratio graph is the supplemental graph that gives the volume dependence of the "ideal" ratio bubble.

(Don't you just love when something "new" is "discovered" that's actually been on the books for over 60 years!!!??? :lol: )

Best regards,

Jeff D. Szymanski
Chief Acoustical Engineer
Auralex Acoustics, Inc.



I'm going to try to find a way to fit this into my website. I have always been engaged by the golden ratio, the room ratio and the ratios presented or discussed by all you guys that have real knowledge of that.

Thanks for your time Jeff, even if it is from such a long ago post.


Brien

_________________
Brien Holcombe
_____________________________________________
Sound: You can't stop it, you can only try to contain it.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group