John Sayers' Design Forum

John Sayers' Recording Studio Design Forum

A World of Experience
Click Here for Information on John's Services
It is currently Fri Jul 30, 2021 2:42 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2012 12:05 pm 

Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 7:36 am
Posts: 2
Location: Croatia, Europe
Hi everyone,
How should I connect multiple mic-preamps (outboard) with few patch panles (in different rooms and different cable lengths) and have option to connect any mic in any room to any preamp from iso-room, studio room, control room.
I would like to avoid XLR patchbays here and keep it simple if is posible.

Here are some of my ideas. I think that all should work (somehow) - but which is the optimum/best?
Mic connections with 3 rooms.jpg

24ch total
Cables length : from rack with mic preamps
1 - 2m to reach control room patch panel (this will be used for guide tracks)
2 - 5m to reach iso-room
6 - 12m to reach studio room
so, is one cable would be used - total length would be 12m
but on the way there it should be also connected at 2m and 4m (e.g.) if daisy chaining is recommended.
All room are in series and patch panels would be in the same line - so it could be connected as #1 option at pic.
#1 option would be best for me - but is there any problem that I don't have in mind?

Usually people would go for XLR patchbay but that is also theoretic degrading sound
so the main question here is:

Is it better sound-wise daisy chaining or install XLR patch bay?

Thanks for any info.


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Report this post
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2012 10:41 pm 

Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 3:21 am
Posts: 171
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
A balanced analog audio XLR interconnect system is very robust. The length of the cable on the output of a mic pre-amp should not affect the audio quality. Daisy Chaining the patch panels should not affect the audio quality either but the more wire connections the more chance of getting it wrong.

I like your system #4 because it gives you more control. With the other systems you could have unintended units still plugged in but forgotten.


Report this post
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2012 11:14 pm 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 10:17 am
Posts: 11938
Location: Santiago, Chile
Yep. Number 4, for sure. It also gives you more flexibility, in being able to patch between rooms if needed.

(If you wanted to get really fancy, you could put in a routing switcher... :) )

- Stuart -

I want this studio to amaze people. "That'll do" doesn't amaze people.

Report this post
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 10 hours

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group